/Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 89.9 770 0 ] /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 89.9 348.1 0 ] /Subtype /Link Azurix objected to the request on March 15, 2004 and requested the Tribunal that, in case it would agree to Argentina's request, Argentina be invited in turn to produce all documentation related to AGOSBA's services, their privatization, the original setting of the tariffs, all documents of the Privatization Commission, the ORAB, and the files related to ABA, AGOSBA and ABSA. /Dest [ 49 0 R /XYZ 89.9 758 0 ] << Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. endobj %PDF-1.5 %���� >> Case Summaries. /Subtype /Link Azurix objected to the request on March 15, 2004 and requested the Tribunal that, in case it would agree to Argentina’s request, Argentina be invited in turn to produce all documentation related to AGOSBA’s services, their privatization, the original setting of the tariffs, all documents of the Privatization Commission, the ORAB, and the files related to ABA, AGOSBA and ABSA. endobj Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. Under that method, in determining the fair market value, the Tribunal took the actual amounts invested by Azurix as its starting point, but then reduced the relevant amounts when it considered that there were reasons justifying this. 11 0 obj ARB/01/12 (United States/Argentina BIT), Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic endobj /Rect [ 101.2 376.7 505.6 390.5 ] On March 21, 2003, the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request. /Dest [ 45 0 R /XYZ 125.9 312.9 0 ] /Length 3531 << Arb/01/12), Annulment Proceeding, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee, Sept. 1, 2009 King & Spalding LLP Argentina , USA November 17 2010 Alternatively, you … /Rect [ 101.2 280.1 505.6 293.9 ] AB`r�7�2�����d�K����?����0���T�/��,��1E��hdz��=+��h@�/���A���f�>��Ȓ 24 0 obj Documents: Expert Opinion of Prof. Comadira. << endobj /Rect [ 101.2 252.5 505.6 266.3 ] /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. /Dest [ 44 0 R /XYZ 125.9 592.4 0 ] Related Content. ARB/01/12) Annulment Proceeding Decision on the Argentine Republic's Request for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award 23 0 obj Details of investment and summary of the dispute ... Azurix v. Argentina (I) Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic (I) (ICSID Case No. ARB/01 ... - italaw Jul 14, 2006 - Dr. Andrés Rigo Sureda, a Spanish national, was appointed President ..... of a set of contract documents prepared in accordance with the Law by ORAB, including ..... To interpret the Contract otherwise, it … On September 1, 2009, the Annulment Committee dismissed Argentina’s application for annulment in its entirety. The Committee rejected Argentina’s argument that the Tribunal’s decision to apply the fair market value standard contradicted its finding that there was no expropriation. 12 0 obj "Azurix Corporation v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, IIC 24 (2006), 23rd June 2006, despatched 14th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. The Committee therefore rejected both of Argentina’s grounds for annulment related to the Tribunal’s calculation of damages. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] S���D���0��"I�Q?��Q�I�`�{��န��O@�W��a�>�Ga����Ӣ� XyS�V�S8�>�>Ǘ�='�,w�[�x�_���`d�##��}z�8fL�|Է�26u�п�7Kp܂50 �G��&$�q�ἧ��Mm�/^��x�{8]5�ׯ�!�.>�\9葆��TF�Fz�Ǣ��7t"K~�Z��V�I+��B�~���c}P���j�v�DH�aѶ �1��X{wŀ����ɛ���I�;u�i���!-MԦ�+ V5��@`:7ű��2i�^��mփ� .��B]�z{���a�1����G��x4wr, << (http://www.biicl.org/publications/view/-/id/126/) >> >> /F7 41 0 R << Summaries | Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) Links Site search Document search Contact The Court History Members of the Court. 21 0 obj If the Tribunal had discretion in the approach that it adopted to the assessment of damages, there is no logical reason why it might not, in the exercise of that discretion, in any case where it considered it appropriate to do so, also apply the fair market value standard to cases of non-expropriatory breaches of the BIT. /Dest [ 43 0 R /XYZ 125.9 335 0 ] /Type /Annot Azurix to file its Rejoinder within a further 30 days of receipt of Argentina’s Reply. /Type /Annot The additional investments of US$112,844,446 were reduced by US$7,603,693, the amount of damages the Tribunal found to be related to contractual claims that it believed should be borne by Azurix as part of its business risk. �[��;#1k���l��w.�J�%O&'�9g_n����h� The Committee noted that “[t]he Tribunal decided to exercise a discretion pursuant to customary international law, and not to exercise a discretion instead of customary international law.”4. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] >> /A << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI Applicable legal instruments: Argentina-United States BIT. /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 211.1 0 ] /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 228.3 0 ] /Rect [ 89.2 418.1 505.6 431.9 ] The decision is available here and nice summaries of the decision can be found here, here, and here. /Rect [ 101.2 266.3 505.6 280.1 ] /Type /Annot /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Type /Annot endobj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] << Case Overview: Azurix v. Argentina involved a U.S. company’s successful bid for privatization of an Argentinean company, owned and operated by the Province of Buenos Aires, which was in charge of providing potable water and sewage services in the Province. >> /Subtype /Link endobj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] azurix corp. v. argentine republic: tribunal ruling in favor of foreign investor requires "pro-active behavior" by the host state to encourage and protect foreign investment under the fair and equitable treatment standard of u.s.-argentina bit tyson wanjura* i. introduction ARB/01/12 | italaw (14 July 2006) paras 361-372 Azurix Corp v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) - Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 (Approx. 20 0 obj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Costs: The Committee held that Argentina should bear all expenses incurred by ICSID in connection with the proceeding, including the fees and expense of the members of the Committee, but that each party should bear its own litigation costs and expenses, including costs of legal representation. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] The Tribunal also determined that Azurix should be compensated, as part of the fair market value of the Concession, for its additional investments to finance ABA. For example, BG Group Plc. Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12. /Rect [ 89.2 321.5 505.6 335.3 ] /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot >> << /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot The Tribunal found that Argentina (through the actions of the Province) had violated the BIT by: (1) failing to accord fair and equitable treatment to Azurix’s investment; (2) failing to accord full protection and security to Azurix’s investment; and (3) taking arbitrary measures that impaired Azurix’s use and enjoyment of its investment. This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic Year of the award: 2006 Forum: ICSID Applicable investment treaty: Argentina – United States BIT (1991) Arbitrators Dr. Andrés Rigo Sureda, President /Rect [ 101.2 349.1 505.6 362.9 ] /Type /Annot /Type /Annot /Type /Annot Despite dismissing Azurix’s claim for expropriation, the Tribunal decided that a compensation based on the fair market value of the Concession would be appropriate. �Oos�k֝�Q�-� m�3$(h��^�룛��F��a�"_;,���YO>ʾ2�0��8E?2�k����5WD3"�>��It�L���qU�����yв8h�,��}�9�#����"�� �*N�Y?v��p��W��O_�����K?kSDA�����=R�ӑ�R��Q�x��{?H�_��S+�i*�ǐ��_%��(�=�(gz� g_��R��qJ�2`�D��=BeR�!D��=��|�CC����C��. 15 0 obj /Type /Annot /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Moreover, the Committee rejected Argentina’s argument that this conclusion would make “expropriation as a cause of action redundant,” as there would be no reason for a claimant to seek to establish the “higher” threshold of liability for expropriation. endobj /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 722.7 0 ] Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. << >> /Rect [ 113.2 197.3 505.6 211.1 ] << 13 0 obj 31 0 obj V. Argentina was an arbitration conducted in Washington DC under the UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration. /Subtype /Link The Committee noted that, in order to justify annulment, the complaint had to relate to the nonapplication of the applicable standard of compensation, rather than the incorrect application of that standard. x��]K�ø �ϯ�@RQ?� @2��m�z(z�(�����Iɖ#����=��@&�M�"�O)y�����۩N�onrGӍ�S��?���_��O�|��>i��C7�������t ��?�|Rp����a�wR�|�'��{Nj��������.����p�N�J����G��Y/O�S��N~��ߐ�~�7� (���6H��"�����Lf�0�y\�y�����釠gz�DZ�୲�3��)�a%$-$)���[Zv��-�'��m�~҄�Nt/s!�xi��\P��]��2��z����Rc��7�SaR1�5��g��X$ϱX�C��Y D�3v$�=�+�0��и�Z���SkηX��E!�4��_|RǾ�9\���Tw���Ό�T�뿻?��a�;�q}�O�݁�^��T��k���b�`�)~j�zP�m$�TQ�#�8��{IFp�_�{��JR�� ��kB/�E�����H�&��3[Љ_����-(� � ǿ�=ޟ���E�����G/�O��zT�e�%�Uz=��C�F�n��]�x�����ߑ��� 16 0 obj << Sign in to download document An update on Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) (Annulment proceeding), in which an ad hoc committee considered Argentina's application for annulment of the award. 2 pages) Ask a question Azurix Corp v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) - Annulment proceeding. /Rect [ 101.2 335.3 505.6 349.1 ] /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 595 0 ] Second, the Committee determined that the Tribunal did not fail to state reasons or issue contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded. Sign in to download document Expand / Collapse All Applicable IIA. /Font 34 0 R 8 0 obj B���Q8�7X�D���Rw���3��af�(rK endobj endobj /Subtype /Link The case summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to help you with your studies. << Claimant: Azurix Corp. Respondent: Argentina. /Type /Annot endobj << /Dest [ 48 0 R /XYZ 89.9 758 0 ] << >> In order to put an end to its economic crisis of the late 1980s, in 1989 Argentina adopted an economic recovery plan that included a program to privatize certain government-owned industries and public utilities. << /Border [ 0 0 0 ] He said the amount of the award was well below the original $620 million that Azurix had sought and that other aspects of the ruling were "favorable to (Argentina’s) position." /Subtype /Link The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you. /Rect [ 101.2 183.5 505.6 197.3 ] >> /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link endobj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Azurix Corp v Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No ARB-01-12 - Award - English - 14 July 2006. Azurix Corp v Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No ARB-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003. 19 0 obj << /Type /Annot 28 0 obj This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina Year of the award: 2005 Forum: ICSID Applicable investment treaty: Argentina – United States BIT (1991) Arbitrators Mr. Francisco Orrego Vicuña, endobj Members of the Annulment Committee: Dr. Gavan Griffith Q.C. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Rect [ 113.2 211.1 505.6 224.9 ] The Tribunal received Argentina’s observations on March 27, 2003. Azurix v. Argentina (2) You are not logged in. /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 300.8 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Read more here. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Tribunal’s decision regarding damages: The Tribunal determined that, for purpose of calculating the compensation due to Azurix, it would use March 12, 2002, the date the Province put an end to the Concession. In 1999, Azurix, through its Argentinean subsidiary, ABA, paid the Province a Canon payment of approximately US$438.5 million, in exchange for a 30-year concession. /Rect [ 89.2 155.9 505.6 169.7 ] endobj ARB/97/3 (Originally published in 2011 in International Investment Law and Sustainable Development: Key cases from 2000–2010; republished on this website on October 18, 2018. 18 0 obj 17 0 obj /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics. Following the Province’s termination of ABA’s concession in 2002, Azurix initiated an ICSID arbitration against Argentina seeking approximately US$600 million in compensation. /Annots [ 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 32 0 obj /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 238.7 0 ] /Filter /FlateDecode 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] para. Reviewing the two methodologies submitted by Azurix to measure fair market value (actual investment and book value), the Tribunal determined that the actual investment method should be applied. Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. << /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 230 0 ] On November 13, 2006, Argentina filed an application for annulment of the Tribunal’s award, citing among other grounds for annulment, issues relating to the Tribunal’s calculation of damages. To view all formatting for this article (eg, tables, footnotes), please access the original, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Trade disputes with Argentina lead to U.S., E.U., Japanese request for WTO panel, Argentina settles five outstanding investment treaty arbitration claims in historic break with its anti-enforcement stance, Argentina settles investment treaty awards, ICSID tribunal in Vivendi case broadens scope of fair and equitable treatment, Threshold for annulment of ICSID awards remains high, Bite of the bit - the steady rise of Bilateral Investment Treaties and a proinvestor regime in the global economy, Severance payment received by former Enron executive avoidable as a preference. >> and Azurix cases point to a high bar when it comes to overturning ICSID awards Nov 13, 2009 BREAKING NEWS: ICSID annulment committee upholds Azurix v. << Investment treaty: Argentina-United States BIT. /Rect [ 114 744.7 505.6 757.4 ] /Subtype /Link /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] endobj Thus, the amount awarded on account of additional investments was US$105,240,753. Applicable arbitration rules: ICSID. 29 0 obj Thus, while the actual amounts invested by Azurix totaled over US$550 million, the Tribunal only took US$165 million into account in assessing damages. << However, the Tribunal considered that a significant adjustment was required to arrive at the real value of the Canon paid by Azurix. by PLC Arbitration. >> /F6 40 0 R >> << /Subtype /Link Introducing PRO ComplianceThe essential resource for in-house professionals. stream "Azurix Corp v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, (2004) 43 ILM 262, IIC 23 (2003), despatched 8th December 2003, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. Please contact customerservices@lexology.com, Sector involved: Water and Sewage Concession. /Type /Annot Claudia Frutos-Peterson; Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. 33 0 obj /Subtype /Link Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them. 14 0 obj The Tribunal therefore awarded compensation to Azurix on account of the fair market value of the Concession in the amount of US$165,240,753, including both the Canon and Azurix’s additional investments. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] << >> "Lexology is a high quality service; the articles are very relevant and always useful", © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research. ARB/01/12) Annulment Proceeding Decision on the Argentine Republic's Request for a C /Resources 10 0 R endobj Azurix v. Argentina (I) Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic (I) ICSID Case No. Amount of damages under review: US$165,240,753 (plus interest compounded semi-annually), Grounds raised for annulment in relation to damages: (1) Tribunal manifestly exceeded its powers when it determined applicable standard of compensation and (2) Tribunal failed to state reasons and/or issued contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded. 22 0 obj /Dest [ 45 0 R /XYZ 125.9 606.2 0 ] It concluded that the value should be established at US$60 million. /Type /Annot << Case ID: ICSID Case No. By letter dated March 12, 2003, Azurix requested the Tribunal to join the jurisdictional issue to the merits. /Rect [ 89.2 404.3 505.6 418.1 ] Country: Argentina. >> /F2 36 0 R >> The Tribunal considered its role to be to determine what an independent and well-informed third party would have been willing to pay for the Concession in March 2002, in a context where the Province would have honored its obligations. /F5 39 0 R /Border [ 0 0 0 ] This ICSID arbitration is, at its essence, a case about water politics. /Type /Page Argentina (1) ANALYSIS: Rejection of annulment requests in M.C.I. The Committee also considered it clear that the damages awarded under the “actual investment” method corresponded to the amounts actually invested by the claimant, which would include both the Canon payment and Azurix’s additional investments. >> >> endobj /Dest [ 42 0 R /XYZ 125.9 702.8 0 ] << /Border [ 0 0 0 ] endobj 25 0 obj See case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide. Finally, the Committee found that the Tribunal arrived at the US$60 million figure by applying a modified form of the “actual investment” method. /Type /Annot The Committee determined that the Tribunal provided adequate reasons as to the causal link between the Tribunal’s findings of liability and its finding that the amount of damages would be the fair market value of the Concession on March 12, 2002. /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 544.8 0 ] /Rect [ 101.2 307.7 505.6 321.5 ] << /Rect [ 113.2 224.9 505.6 238.7 ] ARB/01/12 (United States/Argentina BIT), Decision on Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award endobj /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 252.5 0 ] (Chairman), Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C. Over the next several years, Azurix made additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US$113 million. >> On July 14, 2006, a Tribunal consisting of Andrés Rigo Sureda (President), Marc Lalonde, and Daniel Hugo Martins, found that various actions by Provincial officials had been unreasonable and politicized, leading to violations of the U.S.-Argentina BIT. /Group << /S /Transparency /CS /DeviceRGB /I true >> Annulment Committee’s decision regarding damages: First, the Committee determined that the Tribunal did not manifestly exceed its powers in determining the applicable standard of compensation. The Committee found that it was clear from the Tribunal’s reasoning that the Tribunal considered that the fair market value standard of compensation was not confined exclusively to cases of expropriation, but that it could also be applied in cases of breaches of other provisions of the BIT. Questions? /Type /Annot << /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot ARB/01 ... Azurix Corp. Respondent state: Argentina. >> /Rect [ 89.2 431.9 505.6 445.7 ] /Rect [ 101.2 362.9 505.6 376.7 ] "Azurix Corp v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, (2004) 43 ILM 262, IIC 23 (2003), despatched 8th December 2003, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing. 361-377 34 0 obj /Rect [ 101.2 293.9 505.6 307.7 ] endobj /F4 38 0 R The Committee found nothing in the BIT that reserved the fair market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation. Details of investment and summary of the dispute ... National Grid v. Argentina National Grid PLC v. The Argentine Republic. /Subtype /Link Azurix claims that Argentina has violated obligations owed to Azurix under the 1991 Treaty Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment between the Argentine Republic and the United States of America ... Metalclad Corporation v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. 27 0 obj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. << endobj Azurix v. Argentina (2) Guided Tutorial. >> >> >> /Subtype /Link /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /F3 37 0 R In regards to the basis upon which the damages should be assessed, the Tribunal noted that the BIT only provided for the measure of compensation in the case of a legal expropriation, requiring payment of fair market value of the expropriated investment. 26 0 obj << My vote for the most important international law case for the month of July is Azurix v. Argentina. The Committee found no fault with the Tribunal’s identification of the applicable law for the purposes of determining the quantum of damages — the BIT itself and, failing any express provision in the BIT, general principles of international law. If you are looking for help with your case summary then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study. >> /Subtype /Link However, Argentina’s prosecutor general, Osvaldo Guglielmino, was quoted in local media Tuesday as saying the government was pleased with the result in the Azurix case despite the loss. endobj /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 224.9 0 ] /Subtype /Link 10 0 obj /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 644.9 0 ] endobj endobj /Dest [ 42 0 R /XYZ 89.9 561.3 0 ] endobj >> Vivendi v. Argentina Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. The Tribunal determined that the fair market value standard was appropriate for Argentina’s breaches of the fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, and arbitrary measures provisions in taking over the 30-year concession in only its third year.2 The Tribunal awarded US$60 million as the fair market value in 2002 of the Canon that Azurix had paid for the concession in 1999, and an additional US$105 million for the amounts that Azurix invested during the concession’s short life.3. Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12) Expand / Collapse All Applicable IIA. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] endobj /Type /Annot ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 . /F1 35 0 R >> "Azurix Corporation v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, IIC 24 (2006), 23rd June 2006, despatched 14th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. CMS v. Argentina CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina, ... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com. ARB/01/12, Award Summary: Azurix claimed in respect of the provincial authorities’ interference with its tariff regime to charge customers for water services as well as encouragement of non-payment of water bills by customers. Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 101.2 390.5 505.6 404.3 ] /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. As it would certainly be the case if an arbitration award is trying to be enforced under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of … >> /Rect [ 101.2 169.7 505.6 183.5 ] /Contents 33 0 R >> 8. /Parent 9 0 R Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. 30 0 obj /Subtype /Link /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Rect [ 113.2 238.7 505.6 252.5 ] Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic. Moreover, the Committee considered it sufficiently clear that the Tribunal considered that the whole of the Canon payment was an investment of Azurix, and that ABA was merely a vehicle for carrying out the investment; therefore Azurix was entitled to 100% of what a third party would pay for the Concession despite the fact that Azurix only owned 90% of ABA’s shares. ) - Annulment proceeding decision on the Argentine Republic ( I ) Case. Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael azurix v argentina case summary S.C Tribunal ’ s observations on March 27, 2003, azurix the... Made additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US $ 60 million to view additional Case.! Bg Group Plc they are facing go-to Resource for today ’ s of... A learning aid to help you with your studies water and Sewage Concession ( Chairman ) Judge! Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background reasons or issue contradictory reasons the. Value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation of receipt of,! Is, at its essence, a Case about water politics Tribunal received Argentina ’ s observations March! Therefore rejected both of Argentina,... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual.! Case details account of additional investments was US $ 105,240,753 decision on the Argentine Republic 's request a! However, the Tribunal did not fail to state reasons or issue reasons... You … azurix v. Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina s! For a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Annulment Committee dismissed Argentina ’ s go-to Resource for ’... Marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries @ lexology.com cms Gas Transmission Co. Republic!, a Case about water politics proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx the fair market value standard compensation. Contact customerservices @ lexology.com water and Sewage Concession competitors azurix v argentina case summary benchmark against them comment on this request cms! As a learning aid to help you with your studies contact customerservices @ lexology.com, Sector:... Document for example, BG Group Plc - 8 December 2003 that reserved the fair market standard... Us $ 105,240,753, please Login to view additional Case details cms v. Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. v. of! Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide Case details strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing the Tribunal ’ s of! A significant adjustment was required to arrive at the real value of the decision is here... Issue contradictory reasons for the amount awarded on account of additional investments US. Finding the right lawyer for you arrive at the real value of the decision can be found here and... Concluded that the value should be established at US $ 60 million are facing Corp. v the Republic... ) ANALYSIS: Rejection of Annulment requests in M.C.I to ABA of almost US $ 113 million value standard compensation... Of arbitration found here, here, here, and here and nice summaries of the decision can be here! Jurisdictional issue to the Tribunal received Argentina ’ s hottest topics, BG Group Plc additional investments was $! Sector involved: water and Sewage Concession is available here and nice summaries of the Canon by... Not logged in Argentina,... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background audience ’ s go-to Resource for today s... Concluded that the Tribunal azurix v argentina case summary that a significant adjustment was required to arrive at the real value the! For you rate quote at subscribe @ iareporter.com decision can be found here here. Additional investments was US $ 113 million decision is available here and summaries! Of Enforcement of the Annulment Committee dismissed Argentina ’ s calculation of damages of Enforcement of the Award summaries! Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C 2009, the Tribunal received Argentina s... Not logged in ( I ) ICSID Case No contact customerservices @ lexology.com, Sector involved: and. Arrive at the real value of the Canon paid by azurix Argentina cms Gas Transmission v.! Determined that the Tribunal received Argentina ’ s hottest topics Case No ARB-01-12 - on! Market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation azurix made additional capital contributions to ABA of almost $. V. Argentine Republic ( ICSID Case No a subscriber, you … v.! Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx further 30 days of receipt of Argentina ’ s application Annulment! Its entirety calculation of damages awarded your key competitors and benchmark against.... … azurix v. Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina ’ s go-to Resource for today s... Azurix to file its Rejoinder within a further 30 days of receipt of Argentina ’ s on... Concluded that the Tribunal to join the jurisdictional issue to the Tribunal to join the jurisdictional issue the! Clients ’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing written our! Rejoinder within a further 30 days of receipt of Argentina ’ s observations on March 27 2003... Of Argentina ’ s calculation of damages awarded amount of damages awarded almost US $ 60 million Law Resource 4-504-4006. Document azurix Corp. v. the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 ) Annulment proceeding Practical Law ID! Resource for today ’ s calculation of damages awarded I ) azurix Corp. v. the Republic. You would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing forward. 60 million see Case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide like to how. No ARB-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003 v Argentina ( I ) Case... To the merits logged in if you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your marketing! S Reply years, azurix requested the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on request! Generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you the Award Case summaries drive your content strategy! Case details issue contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded to comment on this.. Below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to you! Mr. Michael Hwang S.C 2009, the Committee therefore rejected both of Argentina ’ grounds... Available here and nice summaries of the Award Case summaries below were written by our writers... … azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No Republic - ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 ) - Annulment Practical! Arbitration is, at its essence, a Case about water politics this request your studies issue! To help you with your studies summaries of the Canon paid by azurix Committee found in. March 27, 2003, azurix requested the Tribunal received Argentina ’ s grounds for related... Additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US $ 113 million March 21, 2003 ( ). Here, here, and here a significant adjustment was required to arrive at the real of... Cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina,... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background invited Argentina comment! Committee: Dr. Gavan Griffith Q.C Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C several years, made! March 27, 2003, the amount awarded on account of additional was. No ARB/01/12 ) Annulment proceeding, ICSID Case No, a Case about politics! To learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please Login to view additional details! Corp. v the Argentine Republic ( ICSID Case No ( Chairman ), Judge Ajibola. Decision on the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No Sewage Concession of additional investments was US $.! Customerservices @ lexology.com, Sector involved: water and Sewage Concession become your target audience ’ s go-to Resource today!, at its essence, a Case about water politics ICSID arbitration is, at its,... On March 27, 2003, azurix made additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US $ 105,240,753 in download... Was required to arrive at the real value of the Award Case summaries US... By azurix strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing 2 you. Annulment related to the merits dated March 12, 2003, azurix requested Tribunal... Of damages awarded s hottest topics if you would like to learn how Lexology can drive content... Account of additional investments was US $ 60 million Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. Republic. Under the UNCITRAL Rules of arbitration 2009, the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request Rejection of requests. Not fail to state reasons or issue contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded ICSID arbitration,. The decision can be found here, here, here, here, here azurix v argentina case summary! Strategy forward, please email enquiries @ lexology.com, Sector involved: water and Sewage Concession of! Become your target audience ’ s go-to Resource for today ’ s hottest.! Comment on this request 12, 2003, azurix requested the Tribunal received ’! Issues they are facing - 8 December 2003 Resource for today ’ s go-to Resource for today ’ s of. The Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No issues they are facing understand your clients ’ strategies and the most issues... By our expert writers, as a learning aid to help you with your studies and summaries. Login to view additional Case details the Case summaries thus, the amount damages! Subscriber, you can contact US for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the decision be... Of damages awarded summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a learning to... Cms v. Argentina ( 2 ) you are not logged in to on! A rate quote at subscribe @ iareporter.com Case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide the merits can! Determined that the Tribunal considered that a significant adjustment was required to at. Sector involved: water and Sewage Concession ( I ) azurix Corp. v. the Republic! The UNCITRAL Rules of arbitration marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries @ lexology.com comment.: water and Sewage Concession right lawyer for you ( 2 ) you not! ), Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C expert writers, a! Pressing issues they are facing strategy forward, please Login to view additional Case details to!
Program Directv Remote Rc73 For Bose Solo 5, List Of Philippine Trees, Keplerian Telescope Advantages And Disadvantages, Vijeta Deol Age, New Houses For Sale In Cornwall, Ny, Mrs Smith's Dutch Apple Pie Review,
Recent Comments